Sea Breeze

Joined

• started 272 topics
• posted 3,498 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by Sea Breeze

• 
  67

  Dinosaur Soft Tissue

  by Sea Breeze in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  back when the dinosaur soft tissue story was broken in 2005, i predicted that that many more soft tissues would be found and that it wouldn't matter if it was supposedly "65 million" years old or "165 million" years old.

  the prediction has proven true and dinosaur soft tissue is routinely now found regardless of supposed age.

  this is easy to predict using a literal reading of genesis and accepting it as history.... .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Sea Breeze

  Below are images of footprints from the Carboniferous Pennsylvania Sandstone :

  Richard Dawkins said, authenticated evidence of humans in the Carboniferous would “blow the theory of evolution out of the water.” (Dawkins, Free Inquiry, vol. 21, no. 4, 2001.)

  

  

  

  James Webb Space Telescope Images Challenge Theories of How Universe Evolved

  "JWST has presented astronomers with an unsettling problem. If the masses and time since the Big Bang are confirmed for these galaxies, fundamental changes to the reigning model of cosmology"

  Evolutionary and deep age assumptions are not getting their predictions fulfilled by the evidence. Biblical statements about our origins are confirmed by science. No need to rewrite the bible. Need to rewrite science.
• 
  67

  Dinosaur Soft Tissue

  by Sea Breeze in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  back when the dinosaur soft tissue story was broken in 2005, i predicted that that many more soft tissues would be found and that it wouldn't matter if it was supposedly "65 million" years old or "165 million" years old.

  the prediction has proven true and dinosaur soft tissue is routinely now found regardless of supposed age.

  this is easy to predict using a literal reading of genesis and accepting it as history.... .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Sea Breeze

  Have those papers upended science? Changed any paradigms? What are experts in the relevant fields saying?

  I already posted what scientists are saying who have a bias towards MOY's

  "It turns out we found something so unexpected it actually creates problems for science. It calls the whole picture of early galaxy formation into question."

  The study was published in the journal Nature on Wednesday (Feb. 22).
• 
  12

  The Two Witnesses of Revelation 11 : The Fulfillment of Prophecy - Part Two

  by EisMe in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  a united witness to the divine plan.

  as my son wrote in his letter:.

  *"with regards to our spiritual journey, there is not enough paper or ink to give it justice.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Sea Breeze

  I, Estephan Leuese, have expressed the fact that I am the “True” faithful and wise servant found at Matthew 24:45-47.

  Jesus asked a similar question in Mk. 3: 33

  And he answered them, saying, Who is my mother?

  Maybe you are the mother of God as well? I means Jesus wanted to know right? Why else would he ask such a question? The goal of all Christians is to identify the current Mother of God! We all know who the first century mother of God was, but who is the current mondern-day mother of God?

  That is what Christians should be busy finding out, not wasting their time putting trust in Jesus himself!

  
  
• 
  67

  Dinosaur Soft Tissue

  by Sea Breeze in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  back when the dinosaur soft tissue story was broken in 2005, i predicted that that many more soft tissues would be found and that it wouldn't matter if it was supposedly "65 million" years old or "165 million" years old.

  the prediction has proven true and dinosaur soft tissue is routinely now found regardless of supposed age.

  this is easy to predict using a literal reading of genesis and accepting it as history.... .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Sea Breeze

  One journal is based knowledge gained via the scientific method,

  @TonusOH

  So, what do you think about all the peer reviewed journals that you would accept that published data confirming Dinosaur soft tissue? Are those all false too?
• 
  67

  Dinosaur Soft Tissue

  by Sea Breeze in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  back when the dinosaur soft tissue story was broken in 2005, i predicted that that many more soft tissues would be found and that it wouldn't matter if it was supposedly "65 million" years old or "165 million" years old.

  the prediction has proven true and dinosaur soft tissue is routinely now found regardless of supposed age.

  this is easy to predict using a literal reading of genesis and accepting it as history.... .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Sea Breeze

  DD,

  Which peer reviewed articles are you referring to that Covid vaccines are safe?
• 
  67

  Dinosaur Soft Tissue

  by Sea Breeze in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  back when the dinosaur soft tissue story was broken in 2005, i predicted that that many more soft tissues would be found and that it wouldn't matter if it was supposedly "65 million" years old or "165 million" years old.

  the prediction has proven true and dinosaur soft tissue is routinely now found regardless of supposed age.

  this is easy to predict using a literal reading of genesis and accepting it as history.... .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Sea Breeze

  Putting them together isn’t that complex, some bacteria require just 180-ish protein coding genes with 160,000 base pairs

  Number of base pairs in the human genome	3 billion
  Number of base pairs in a gene	300 to over 1 million
  Number of base pairs in a codon	3
  Number of codons in a gene	64 possible
  Number of amino acids	20

  And just getting 8 out of those 160,000 base pairs you mention in the correct order through natural selection would take longer than the supposed age of the universe to achieve.

  No, it hasn't. Having claims published in YEC journals is not peer-review.

  TonusOH,

  Peer review is made up of "peers"... people who have the same level of education from reputable universities. What difference does it make if a journal is characterized by some as Old earth or young earth?
  
  Regardless.... it doesn't matter. Below is a link to a long list of peer reviewed papers, the majority are just secular journals - like Nature, National Academy of Sciences, Paleontology etc.

  
  https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1eXtKzjWP2B1FMDVrsJ_992ITFK8H3LXfPFNM1ll-Yiw/edit?pli=1&gid=0#gid=0

  I believe you are experiencing disorientation due to the paradigm shift that is taking place in our scientific community. Claiming things are untrue may make you feel better, but it doesn't address the astounding findings that have been brought to the fore on this thread.
  
  Deal with it.
  
  
• 
  67

  Dinosaur Soft Tissue

  by Sea Breeze in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  back when the dinosaur soft tissue story was broken in 2005, i predicted that that many more soft tissues would be found and that it wouldn't matter if it was supposedly "65 million" years old or "165 million" years old.

  the prediction has proven true and dinosaur soft tissue is routinely now found regardless of supposed age.

  this is easy to predict using a literal reading of genesis and accepting it as history.... .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Sea Breeze

  experts also avoid peer review

  TonusOH,

  Wow! You make one false claim after another in your last post. Almost everything on this thread has been peer-reviewed.

  For example, Dr. John Sanford retired as a long-time Professor at Cornell University ? This guy's work is SOLID. Dr. Sanford is a former atheist. Since the mid-1980s, Sanford has looked into theistic evolution (1985–late 1990s), Old Earth creationism (late 1990s), and Young Earth creationism (2000–present). According to him, he did not fully reject Darwinian evolution until the year 2000. Dr. Sanford and his wife Helen have three children.

  On behalf of intelligent design, Dr. Sanford was involved in the 2005 Kansas evolution hearings. He denied the principle of common descent and testified ..."that we were created by a special creation, by God."

  As an inventor, Dr. Sanford holds more than 25 patents including the biolistic process known as the "gene gun" featured at the Smithsonian Museum. It doesn't get more reputable than this guy. Yet here he is addressing the prestigious National Institutes of Health explaining his peer-reviewed paper on how (time mark 19 minutes or so through 23:17) it would take longer than the supposed existence of the universe to produce just one 8 letter genetic word from natural selection ( and that is with very liberal and favorable parameters)

  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=38XSkLqZ2gs&ab_channel=EvidenceandReasons

  So, we can add the field of genetics to the list of "problem science" for the "deep timers" to the other fields already discussed: dinosaur soft tissue, human footprints in Carboniferous Sandstone, early galaxy formation in the beginning of time that is identical to galaxies like ours now.
  
  The fact of the matter is that "deep time" has been destroyed by multiple sciences from top scientists who did not start off as creationists, but ended up one because that is where the evidence led.
  
  Secularists seem to just hide their heads in the sand, engage in hand-waving and say ignorant things like you said above to improve the optics of their credulity. This is to be expected during a paradigm shift, which is what we are experiencing.
  
  The evidence for creation is overwhelming.
  
  
  
• 
  67

  Dinosaur Soft Tissue

  by Sea Breeze in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  back when the dinosaur soft tissue story was broken in 2005, i predicted that that many more soft tissues would be found and that it wouldn't matter if it was supposedly "65 million" years old or "165 million" years old.

  the prediction has proven true and dinosaur soft tissue is routinely now found regardless of supposed age.

  this is easy to predict using a literal reading of genesis and accepting it as history.... .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Sea Breeze

  Granted, it's based on the same literalist thinking that gives us a 6,000 year old planet

  No, it is not based on literalist thinking. The 7000 years creative "day" is just as symbolic as a "time period of an undetermined length".

  Regardless, deep age is falling apart for secularists from a number of different points of view across many different scientific disciplines. Deep time is contradicted by the new James Webb Space Telescope.
  
  They were supposed to find an early universe with lots of Generation III star formation along with little to no galaxy formation.
  
  They found the opposite - fully formed spiral galaxy formation as big as the Milky Way from the dawn of time :
  

  "This was astounding — we're finding galaxy candidates as massive as our own galaxy when the universe was 3% of its current age."...

  "It turns out we found something so unexpected it actually creates problems for science. It calls the whole picture of early galaxy formation into question."

  It calls a lot more than early galaxy formation into question. If the sun, moon and stars were all created in one day, this evidence is predictable and exactly what a creationist would expect to find.
  
  For secularists, the list of things that don't fit keeps growing:
  
  Neither Dinosaur Soft Tissue, human footprints in Carboniferous sandstone, nor star/galaxy formation seem to be affected by the passage of deep time and directly contradict a secularist world-view.

  Exactly how much evidence does it take to convince a secularist that his worldview doesn't fit the facts? Is there any amount? Is it all bananas?

  “It’s bananas,” said Erica Nelson, an assistant professor of astrophysics at the University of Colorado, Boulder, and a co-author of the paper, in a statement that accompanied its release. “You just don’t expect the early universe to be able to organize itself that quickly. These galaxies should not have had time to form.”
• 
  67

  Dinosaur Soft Tissue

  by Sea Breeze in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  back when the dinosaur soft tissue story was broken in 2005, i predicted that that many more soft tissues would be found and that it wouldn't matter if it was supposedly "65 million" years old or "165 million" years old.

  the prediction has proven true and dinosaur soft tissue is routinely now found regardless of supposed age.

  this is easy to predict using a literal reading of genesis and accepting it as history.... .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Sea Breeze

  it was changed to each day being a undisclosed period of time.

  Yes, that is how I remember it when I left in '95. Everyone I knew interpreted that to mean MOY's.
• 
  67

  Dinosaur Soft Tissue

  by Sea Breeze in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  back when the dinosaur soft tissue story was broken in 2005, i predicted that that many more soft tissues would be found and that it wouldn't matter if it was supposedly "65 million" years old or "165 million" years old.

  the prediction has proven true and dinosaur soft tissue is routinely now found regardless of supposed age.

  this is easy to predict using a literal reading of genesis and accepting it as history.... .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Sea Breeze

  You are allowing yourself to be controlled by your belief system as you were when you were a jw .

  @ TouchofGrey
  
  The evidence led me far from a Watchtower view. I guess I should remind you that we all believed in millions of years as JW's. We certainly didn't believe in a literal 6 earth-day creation.